Core i7-3612QM
VS
Opteron 6220

Core i7-3612QM vs Opteron 6220

Intel

Core i7-3612QM

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Opteron 6220

8 Cores8 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3612QM is positioned at rank 1030 and the Opteron 6220 is on rank 71, so the Opteron 6220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3612QM

#1018
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2380%
#1019
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2345%
#1020
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2152%
#1021
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2143%
#1022
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2123%
#1024
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2050%
#1025
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1966%
#1026
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1963%
#1027
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1910%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
99%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
95%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
94%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6220

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1749%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
330%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
293%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
227%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
96%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
96%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
96%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
93%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
92%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
90%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
86%
#71
Opteron 6220
MSRP: $523|Avg: $239
100%
#79
Opteron 3380
MSRP: $229|Avg: $427
92%
#82
Xeon W-10855M
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
87%
#85
Opteron 6234
MSRP: $377|Avg: $141
86%
#86
Xeon E7330
MSRP: $64|Avg: $60
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 6220 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-3612QM in both compute-intensive tasks (2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-3612QMOpteron 6220
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($239)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Opteron 6220 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 37% cheaper ($239 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-3612QMOpteron 6220
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+61%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($239)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3612QM and Opteron 6220

Intel

Core i7-3612QM

The Core i7-3612QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,661 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron 6220

The Opteron 6220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,753 points. Launch price was $523.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3612QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6220 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6220 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3612QM versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 6220 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Opteron 6220 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-3612QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6220 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3612QM scores 4,661 against the Opteron 6220's 4,753 — a 2% lead for the Opteron 6220. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3612QM vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6220.

FeatureCore i7-3612QMOpteron 6220
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (per module)+700%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark
4,661
4,753+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
600
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3612QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6220 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3612QMOpteron 6220
Socket
FCBGA1224
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3612QM) / not specified (Opteron 6220). The Core i7-3612QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Opteron 6220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3612QM targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3612QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.

FeatureCore i7-3612QMOpteron 6220
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3612QM launched at $378 MSRP, while the Opteron 6220 debuted at $523.

FeatureCore i7-3612QMOpteron 6220
MSRP
$378-28%
$523
Avg Price (30d)
$239
Release Date
2012
2011
Core i7-3612QM vs Opteron 6220