Core i7-3632QM
VS
Core i3-7320

Core i7-3632QM vs Core i3-7320

Intel

Core i7-3632QM

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-7320

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3632QM is positioned at rank 57 and the Core i3-7320 is on rank 434, so the Core i7-3632QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3632QM

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
98%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#45
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
216%
#46
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
213%
#47
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
195%
#48
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
195%
#49
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
193%
#51
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
186%
#52
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
178%
#53
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
178%
#54
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
173%
#57
Core i7-3632QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
97%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6388%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6036%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4382%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1320%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1046%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
915%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
524%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
517%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
471%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
471%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
466%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
453%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
447%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
445%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
441%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
97%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
96%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
96%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
95%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
95%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
100%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
99%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
98%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
96%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7320 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-3632QMCore i3-7320
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3632QM (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-3632QMCore i3-7320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3632QM and Core i3-7320

Intel

Core i7-3632QM

The Core i7-3632QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,754 points. Launch price was $359.

Intel

Core i3-7320

The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3632QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-7320 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-3632QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3632QM versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7320 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i7-3632QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-7320 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3632QM scores 4,754 against the Core i3-7320's 4,831 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i3-7320. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3632QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320.

FeatureCore i7-3632QMCore i3-7320
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz+28%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
4.1 GHz+86%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,754
4,831+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,388
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3632QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-3632QM versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7320 — the Core i7-3632QM supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7320 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3632QM) and B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7320).

FeatureCore i7-3632QMCore i3-7320
Socket
FCBGA1224
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+39900%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32
64 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-3632QM) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3632QM) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7320) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3632QM rivals AMD A10-5750M; Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

FeatureCore i7-3632QMCore i3-7320
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop