Core i7-3820QM vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Core i7-3820QM vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U Performance Spectrum

Core i7-3820QM

4 / 8

5,607

0.0%

5,639

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3820QM vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3820QM vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3820QM

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,607 vs 5,639).
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3820QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3820QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U better than Core i7-3820QM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-3820QM is ahead with a 23.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i7-3820QM also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3820QM vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3820QM

The Core i7-3820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,607 points. Launch price was $498.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,639 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-3820QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3820QM versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3820QM (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-3820QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3820QM scores 5,607 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U's 5,639 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3820QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

Feature	Core i7-3820QM	Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+35%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	5,607	5,639
Geekbench 6 Single	604	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3820QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3820QM	Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Socket	PGA988	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3820QM) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U). The Core i7-3820QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3820QM targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3820QM rivals A10-4600M.