Core i7-3820QM
VS
Xeon E5649

Core i7-3820QM vs Xeon E5649

Intel

Core i7-3820QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5649

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3820QM is positioned at rank 1075 and the Xeon E5649 is on rank 938, so the Xeon E5649 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3820QM

#1062
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2874%
#1063
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2832%
#1064
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2599%
#1065
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2588%
#1066
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2564%
#1068
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2476%
#1069
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2374%
#1070
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2370%
#1071
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2307%
#1074
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1075
Core i7-3820QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1077
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1079
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
99%
#1080
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1082
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1083
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
97%
#1088
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
94%
#1089
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5649

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
28430%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5368%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4769%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3684%
#527
Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP: $11600|Avg: $11600
99%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
93%
#938
Xeon E5649
MSRP: $774|Avg: N/A
100%
#939
Xeon E3-1220L v3
MSRP: $193|Avg: $30
100%
#940
Xeon E5-2670 v2
MSRP: $1556|Avg: $189
100%
#941
Xeon E5-2637 v3
MSRP: $996|Avg: $75
100%
#943
Xeon E5-1680 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $150
98%
#944
Opteron 144
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
98%
#945
Opteron 4386
MSRP: $459|Avg: $459
98%
#946
Xeon E5-2640
MSRP: $885|Avg: N/A
97%
#947
Xeon E5-2643 v4
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $555
97%
#949
Xeon E5-2630 v2
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1224
96%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($774) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5649 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-3820QMXeon E5649
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($774)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3820QM ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($774 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-3820QMXeon E5649
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($774)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3820QM and Xeon E5649

Intel

Core i7-3820QM

The Core i7-3820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,607 points. Launch price was $498.

Intel

Xeon E5649

The Xeon E5649 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,659 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3820QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5649 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5649 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3820QM versus 2.93 GHz on the Xeon E5649 — a 23.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-3820QM (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core i7-3820QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5649 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3820QM scores 5,607 against the Xeon E5649's 5,659 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5649. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 604 vs 415, a 37.1% lead for the Core i7-3820QM that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3820QM vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon E5649.

FeatureCore i7-3820QMXeon E5649
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+26%
2.93 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+7%
2.53 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12288 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
5,607
5,659
Geekbench 6 Single
604+46%
415
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,109
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3820QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5649 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3820QM versus DDR3 1333 MHz on the Xeon E5649 — the Xeon E5649 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5649 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 160% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-3820QM) vs 3 (Xeon E5649). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3820QM) vs 0 (Xeon E5649) — the Core i7-3820QM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3820QM) and Intel 5520,Intel X58 (Xeon E5649).

FeatureCore i7-3820QMXeon E5649
Socket
PGA988
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3 1333 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
288 GB+800%
RAM Channels
2
3+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3820QM) vs true (Xeon E5649). The Core i7-3820QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5649 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3820QM targets High Performance Laptop, Xeon E5649 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-3820QM rivals A10-4600M.

FeatureCore i7-3820QMXeon E5649
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
High Performance Laptop
Server