Core i7-3920XM vs Core i7-4800MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3920XM vs Core i7-4800MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3920XM vs Core i7-4800MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3920XM

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Core i7-4800MQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,713 vs 5,773).
❌17% higher power demand at 55W vs 47W.

Core i7-4800MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 47W instead of 55W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $380 MSRP, while Core i7-3920XM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3920XM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4800MQ better than Core i7-3920XM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-3920XM is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4800MQ pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4800MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4800MQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-4800MQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $380 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-3920XM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4800MQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3920XM vs Core i7-4800MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3920XM

The Core i7-3920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,713 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3920XM and Core i7-4800MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3920XM versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3920XM (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-3920XM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4800MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3920XM scores 5,713 against the Core i7-4800MQ's 5,773 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4800MQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-3920XM	Core i7-4800MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+7%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,713	5,773+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	686	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3920XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4800MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3920XM	Core i7-4800MQ
Socket	PGA988	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3920XM) / not specified (Core i7-4800MQ). The Core i7-3920XM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i7-4800MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3920XM targets Extreme Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3920XM rivals A10-5750M.