Core i7-3920XM vs Xeon E5-1410 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3920XM vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3920XM vs Xeon E5-1410 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3920XM

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 80W, a 25W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon E5-1410 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,713 vs 5,715).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1410 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌45.5% higher power demand at 80W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3920XM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1410 v2 better than Core i7-3920XM?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1410 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3920XM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1410 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-1410 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1410 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3920XM vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3920XM

The Core i7-3920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,713 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Xeon E5-1410 v2

The Xeon E5-1410 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 5,715 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3920XM and Xeon E5-1410 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3920XM versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 v2 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-3920XM (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-3920XM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3920XM scores 5,713 against the Xeon E5-1410 v2's 5,715 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-1410 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3920XM vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 v2.

Feature	Core i7-3920XM	Xeon E5-1410 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+4%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,713	5,715
Geekbench 6 Single	686	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3920XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3920XM	Xeon E5-1410 v2
Socket	PGA988	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3920XM) / not specified (Xeon E5-1410 v2). The Core i7-3920XM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3920XM targets Extreme Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3920XM rivals A10-5750M.