
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition

Xeon E5-2618L v4
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2618L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2618L v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
Xeon E5-2618L v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($779 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($779 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,429 vs 12,460).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2618L v4 better than Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
The Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Max frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 1,536 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,460 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2618L v4
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition. The Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition scores 12,460 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition | Xeon E5-2618L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB | 25 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1,536 kB | 2.5 MB+67% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 12,460 | 12,429 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 800 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition) / not specified (Xeon E5-2618L v4). Primary use case: Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition rivals FX-8350.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition | Xeon E5-2618L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | HEDT Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition was priced at $990, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 came in at $779. On launch pricing ($990 vs $779), Xeon E5-2618L v4 was $211 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 16.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — making the Xeon E5-2618L v4 the 23.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition | Xeon E5-2618L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $990 | $779-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 16.0+27% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














