Core i7-4600M
VS
Core i5-2400S

Core i7-4600M vs Core i5-2400S

Intel

Core i7-4600M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-2400S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4600M is positioned at rank 71 and the Core i5-2400S is on rank 713, so the Core i7-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4600M

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
94%
#59
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
229%
#60
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
226%
#61
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
207%
#62
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
206%
#63
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
204%
#65
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
197%
#66
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
189%
#67
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
189%
#68
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
184%
#71
Core i7-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
98%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2400S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13203%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12475%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9058%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2729%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2161%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1891%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1083%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1069%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
973%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
973%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
962%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
936%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
923%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
919%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
911%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
100%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
100%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
99%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
99%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
99%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
99%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
99%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
99%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
99%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
98%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
98%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
98%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
98%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-2400S delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-4600M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-4600MCore i5-2400S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-4600MCore i5-2400S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4600M and Core i5-2400S

Intel

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

Intel

Core i5-2400S

The Core i5-2400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,187 points. Launch price was $141.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4600M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2400S offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2400S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2400S — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4600M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-4600M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-2400S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4600M scores 3,204 against the Core i5-2400S's 3,187 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-4600M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 656 vs 1,965 (99.9% advantage for the Core i5-2400S). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,025 vs 578, a 55.8% lead for the Core i7-4600M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,132 vs 1,966 (8.1% advantage for the Core i7-4600M). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600M vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400S.

FeatureCore i7-4600MCore i5-2400S
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+9%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+16%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6144 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,204
3,187
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
1,965+200%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,025+77%
578
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,132+8%
1,966
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4600M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2400S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2400S — the Core i7-4600M supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2400S).

FeatureCore i7-4600MCore i5-2400S
Socket
PGA946
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L 1600 MHz
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i7-4600M) vs Yes (Core i5-2400S). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) and Intel HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4600M targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-4600MCore i5-2400S
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
Yes
Target Use
Mobile