Core i7-4600M vs PRO A8-8650B

Core i7-4600M vs PRO A8-8650B Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4600M

2 / 4

3,204

0.0%

3,230

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4600M vs PRO A8-8650B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4600M vs PRO A8-8650B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4600M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while PRO A8-8650B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A8-8650B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,204 vs 3,230).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

PRO A8-8650B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4600M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A8-8650B better than Core i7-4600M?

Yes. PRO A8-8650B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A8-8650B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A8-8650B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A8-8650B still makes the most sense overall. PRO A8-8650B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A8-8650B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4600M vs PRO A8-8650B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

PRO A8-8650B

The PRO A8-8650B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,230 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4600M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A8-8650B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A8-8650B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M versus 3.9 GHz on the PRO A8-8650B — a 8% clock advantage for the PRO A8-8650B (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4600M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A8-8650B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4600M scores 3,204 against the PRO A8-8650B's 3,230 — a 0.8% lead for the PRO A8-8650B.

Feature	Core i7-4600M	PRO A8-8650B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,204	3,230
Cinebench R23 Multi	656	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,025	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,132	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4600M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A8-8650B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4600M	PRO A8-8650B
Socket	PGA946	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L 1600 MHz	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-4600M) / not specified (PRO A8-8650B). The Core i7-4600M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the PRO A8-8650B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4600M targets Mobile.