Atom x5-E8000 vs Core i7-4600M
Atom x5-E8000
Core i7-4600M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x5-E8000 is positioned at rank 18 and the Core i7-4600M is on rank 71, so the Atom x5-E8000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-E8000
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4600M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x5-E8000 | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x5-E8000 | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x5-E8000 and Core i7-4600M
Atom x5-E8000
The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.
Core i7-4600M
The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.
Processing Power
The Atom x5-E8000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4600M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-E8000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — a 110.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-4600M. The Atom x5-E8000 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E8000 scores 3,219 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom x5-E8000. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E8000 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600M.
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.04 GHz | 3.6 GHz+246% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,219 | 3,204 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 656 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,025 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,132 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Atom x5-E8000 versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the Core i7-4600M supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-4600M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom x5-E8000) vs 16 (Core i7-4600M) — the Core i7-4600M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom x5-E8000) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1600 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-E8000) / true (Core i7-4600M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Atom x5-E8000) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4600M targets Mobile.
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom x5-E8000 and Core i7-4600M
