
Atom x5-E8000 vs PRO A8-8650B

Atom x5-E8000

PRO A8-8650B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x5-E8000 is positioned at rank 18 and the PRO A8-8650B is on rank 334, so the Atom x5-E8000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-E8000
Performance Per Dollar PRO A8-8650B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x5-E8000 | PRO A8-8650B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x5-E8000 | PRO A8-8650B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x5-E8000 and PRO A8-8650B

Atom x5-E8000
The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.

PRO A8-8650B
The PRO A8-8650B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,230 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Atom x5-E8000 and PRO A8-8650B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 versus 3.9 GHz on the PRO A8-8650B — a 115.8% clock advantage for the PRO A8-8650B. The Atom x5-E8000 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A8-8650B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E8000 scores 3,219 against the PRO A8-8650B's 3,230 — a 0.3% lead for the PRO A8-8650B.
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | PRO A8-8650B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.04 GHz | 3.9 GHz+275% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4096 kB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-50% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 3,219 | 3,230 |
Advanced Features
The Atom x5-E8000 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)), while the PRO A8-8650B requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | PRO A8-8650B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












