Atom x5-E8000 vs Phenom II X6 1045T

Atom x5-E8000 vs Phenom II X6 1045T Performance Spectrum

Atom x5-E8000

4 / 4

3,219

0.0%

3,244

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E8000 vs Phenom II X6 1045T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E8000 vs Phenom II X6 1045T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E8000

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 5W instead of 95W, a 90W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), while Phenom II X6 1045T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,219 vs 3,244).
❌Launch MSRP is still $18 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1045T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X6 1045T

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x5-E8000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1800% higher power demand at 95W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E8000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x5-E8000 better than Phenom II X6 1045T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x5-E8000 is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1045T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1045T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x5-E8000 is the better buy right now. Atom x5-E8000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $18 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom II X6 1045T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (178.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E8000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-E8000 vs Phenom II X6 1045T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E8000

The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.

Phenom II X6 1045T

The Phenom II X6 1045T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,244 points. Launch price was $175.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-E8000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1045T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1045T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1045T — a 101.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1045T. The Atom x5-E8000 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1045T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E8000 scores 3,219 against the Phenom II X6 1045T's 3,244 — a 0.8% lead for the Phenom II X6 1045T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E8000 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1045T.

Feature	Atom x5-E8000	Phenom II X6 1045T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	1.04 GHz	3.2 GHz+208%
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Thuban (2010)
PassMark	3,219	3,244