A10-9700E vs Atom x5-E8000

A10-9700E vs Atom x5-E8000 Performance Spectrum

A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,250

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x5-E8000

4 / 4

3,219

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700E vs Atom x5-E8000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700E vs Atom x5-E8000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700E

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x5-E8000.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 35W vs 5W.

Atom x5-E8000

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,219 vs 3,250).
❌Launch MSRP is still $18 MSRP, while A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700E.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9700E better than Atom x5-E8000?

Yes. A10-9700E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-9700E has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 236.5% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-9700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-9700E is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-9700E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $18 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.0% higher PassMark. Atom x5-E8000 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2016 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (178.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-9700E vs Atom x5-E8000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Atom x5-E8000

The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-9700E and Atom x5-E8000 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 — a 108.4% clock advantage for the A10-9700E. The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x5-E8000 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Atom x5-E8000's 3,219 — a 1% lead for the A10-9700E. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A10-9700E	Atom x5-E8000
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+237%	1.04 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,250	3,219
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700E versus DDR3L-1600 on the Atom x5-E8000 — the A10-9700E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9700E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700E) vs 4 (Atom x5-E8000) — the A10-9700E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700E) and Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom x5-E8000).

Feature	A10-9700E	Atom x5-E8000
Socket	AM4	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+100%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9700E) / not specified (Atom x5-E8000). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-9700E) and Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Atom x5-E8000) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.