A10-9700E vs Core i5-4400E

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4400E Performance Spectrum

A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,250

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4400E

2 / 4

3,251

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4400E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4400E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700E

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4400E.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,250 vs 3,251).

Core i5-4400E

2013

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9700E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $266 MSRP, while A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700E.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9700E better than Core i5-4400E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-9700E is ahead with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4400E pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4400E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-9700E is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A10-9700E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $266 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4400E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4400E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4400E

The Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9700E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4400E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4400E — a 5.9% clock advantage for the A10-9700E (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4400E uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Core i5-4400E's 3,251 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-4400E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4400E.

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i5-4400E
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+11%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,250	3,251
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4400E uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700E versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4400E — the A10-9700E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9700E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700E) vs 16 (Core i5-4400E) — the Core i5-4400E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i5-4400E
Socket	AM4	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4400E). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-9700E) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4400E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power, Core i5-4400E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.