A10-9700E vs Core i5-4400E

A10-9700E

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Core i5-4400E

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,250

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4400E

2 / 4

3,251

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9700E is positioned at rank 391 and the Core i5-4400E is on rank 1032, so the A10-9700E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9700E

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

5754%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

5437%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

3948%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

1189%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

942%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

824%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

472%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

466%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

424%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

424%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

419%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

408%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

402%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

401%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

397%

#333

Core i9-9920X

MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464

99%

#334

Core i3-9100

MSRP: $122|Avg: $125

97%

#335

Core i9-10900X

MSRP: $590|Avg: $425

97%

#391

A10-9700E

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#392

A10-7860K

MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A

100%

#393

Athlon X4 845

MSRP: $70|Avg: $15

99%

#395

Celeron G3930

MSRP: $42|Avg: $25

99%

#396

Ryzen 3 1300X

MSRP: $129|Avg: $54

99%

#400

Phenom II X3 710

MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A

98%

#402

A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A

98%

#403

Celeron G3930TE

MSRP: $42|Avg: $29

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4400E

#1020

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

2401%

#1021

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

2366%

#1022

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2172%

#1023

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2162%

#1024

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2142%

#1026

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2069%

#1027

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1984%

#1028

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1980%

#1029

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1927%

#1032

Core i5-4400E

MSRP: $266|Avg: $50

100%

#1034

Pentium Dual Core T4400

MSRP: $107|Avg: $5

98%

#1037

Core i7-8665UE

MSRP: $409|Avg: $409

97%

#1038

Celeron T3300

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

96%

#1039

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

MSRP: $86|Avg: $30

96%

#1042

Core i7-3612QE

MSRP: $426|Avg: $50

95%

#1043

A10-7300

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

95%

#1044

Pentium Dual Core T4200

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

94%

#1045

A6 Micro-6500T

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

94%

#1046

Pentium N3520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

94%

#1047

E2-3800

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-9700E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	A10-9700E	Core i5-4400E
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4400E (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	A10-9700E	Core i5-4400E
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

A10-9700E Benchmark Check

Core i5-4400E Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-9700E and Core i5-4400E

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4400E

The Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9700E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4400E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4400E — a 5.9% clock advantage for the A10-9700E (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4400E uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Core i5-4400E's 3,251 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-4400E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4400E.

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i5-4400E
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+11%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,250	3,251
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4400E uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700E versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4400E — the A10-9700E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9700E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700E) vs 16 (Core i5-4400E) — the Core i5-4400E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i5-4400E
Socket	AM4	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+33%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	✅
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4400E). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-9700E) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4400E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power, Core i5-4400E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.