A10-9700E vs Pentium Gold 4417U

AMD

A10-9700E

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold 4417U

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2019

A10-9700E vs Pentium Gold 4417U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700E vs Pentium Gold 4417U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700E vs Pentium Gold 4417U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700E

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Pentium Gold 4417U needs a discrete GPU.
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium Gold 4417U.

Trade-offs

  • ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Pentium Gold 4417U

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9700E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (3,240 vs 3,250).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700E.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9700E better than Pentium Gold 4417U?
Yes. A10-9700E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A10-9700E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-9700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A10-9700E is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A10-9700E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium Gold 4417U only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.0% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Gold 4417U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9700E vs Pentium Gold 4417U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Pentium Gold 4417U

The Pentium Gold 4417U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,240 points. Launch price was $161.

⚑

Processing Power

The A10-9700E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Gold 4417U offers 2 cores / 4 threads β€” the A10-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium Gold 4417U β€” a 41.4% clock advantage for the A10-9700E (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016βˆ’2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses Kaby Lake Refresh (2017βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Pentium Gold 4417U's 3,240 β€” a 0.3% lead for the A10-9700E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 2 MB on the Pentium Gold 4417U.

FeatureA10-9700EPentium Gold 4417U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+52%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+30%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
2048 kB+100%
1 MB
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016βˆ’2019)
Kaby Lake Refresh (2017βˆ’2019)
PassMark
3,250
3,240
Geekbench 6 Single
600
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-9700EPentium Gold 4417U
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
No
β€”
PCIe Lanes
8
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9700E) / not specified (Pentium Gold 4417U). The A10-9700E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Pentium Gold 4417U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.

FeatureA10-9700EPentium Gold 4417U
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
AMD-V
β€”
Target Use
Low Power
β€”