A10-9700E vs Core i7-4610M

A10-9700E vs Core i7-4610M Performance Spectrum

A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,250

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4610M

2 / 4

3,251

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700E vs Core i7-4610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700E vs Core i7-4610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700E

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i7-4610M needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4610M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,250 vs 3,251).

Core i7-4610M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700E.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4610M better than A10-9700E?

Yes. Core i7-4610M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4610M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4610M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4610M still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-4610M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, A10-9700E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9700E vs Core i7-4610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-4610M

The Core i7-4610M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9700E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4610M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4610M — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610M (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-4610M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Core i7-4610M's 3,251 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-4610M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4610M.

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i7-4610M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,250	3,251
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4610M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i7-4610M
Socket	AM4	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9700E) / not specified (Core i7-4610M). The A10-9700E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-4610M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.