A10-9700E vs Xeon W3570

A10-9700E vs Xeon W3570 Performance Spectrum

A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,250

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon W3570

4 / 8

3,267

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700E vs Xeon W3570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700E vs Xeon W3570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700E

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon W3570 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W3570.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,250 vs 3,267).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3570, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W3570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700E.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3570 better than A10-9700E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-9700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W3570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3570 is the better buy right now. Xeon W3570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $999 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9700E vs Xeon W3570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon W3570

The Xeon W3570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $480.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9700E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3570's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3570 — a 1.1% clock advantage for the A10-9700E (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon W3570 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Xeon W3570's 3,267 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W3570. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3570.

Feature	A10-9700E	Xeon W3570
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+1%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,250	3,267
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-9700E	Xeon W3570
Socket	AM4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9700E) / not specified (Xeon W3570). The A10-9700E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon W3570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.