A10-9700E vs Xeon E5-2407 v2

A10-9700E vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Performance Spectrum

A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,250

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2407 v2

4 / 4

3,272

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700E vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700E vs Xeon E5-2407 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700E

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon E5-2407 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2407 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2407 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,250 vs 3,272).

Xeon E5-2407 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700E.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2407 v2 better than A10-9700E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2407 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-9700E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2407 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2407 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2407 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2407 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $250 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9700E vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,272 points. Launch price was $476.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-9700E and Xeon E5-2407 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 — a 37.3% clock advantage for the A10-9700E (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Xeon E5-2407 v2's 3,272 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2407 v2. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 v2.

Feature	A10-9700E	Xeon E5-2407 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+46%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+25%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	3,250	3,272
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-9700E	Xeon E5-2407 v2
Socket	AM4	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9700E) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407 v2). The A10-9700E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.