Atom x5-E8000 vs Pentium D1508

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E8000 vs Pentium D1508 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E8000 vs Pentium D1508: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E8000

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $88 less on MSRP ($18 MSRP vs $106 MSRP).
✅Delivers 485.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 178.8 vs 30.6 PassMark/$ ($18 MSRP vs $106 MSRP).
✅Draws 5W instead of 25W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,219 vs 3,240).

Pentium D1508

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x5-E8000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 178.8 PassMark/$ ($106 MSRP vs $18 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 25W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E8000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x5-E8000 better than Pentium D1508?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x5-E8000 is ahead with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium D1508 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium D1508 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x5-E8000 is the better buy right now. Atom x5-E8000 comes in $88 cheaper on MSRP at $18 MSRP versus $106 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium D1508 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 485.1% better value on MSRP (178.8 vs 30.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E8000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-E8000 vs Pentium D1508 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E8000

The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.

Pentium D1508

The Pentium D1508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,240 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-E8000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium D1508 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-E8000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium D1508 — a 85.7% clock advantage for the Pentium D1508. The Atom x5-E8000 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium D1508 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E8000 scores 3,219 against the Pentium D1508's 3,240 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium D1508. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E8000 vs 3 MB on the Pentium D1508.

Feature	Atom x5-E8000	Pentium D1508
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.04 GHz	2.6 GHz+150%
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	3,219	3,240

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom x5-E8000 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)), while the Pentium D1508 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Atom x5-E8000	Pentium D1508
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom x5-E8000 was priced at $18, while the Pentium D1508 came in at $106. On launch pricing ($18 vs $106), Atom x5-E8000 was $88 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x5-E8000 delivers 178.8 pts/$ vs 30.6 pts/$ for the Pentium D1508 — making the Atom x5-E8000 the 141.6% better value option.

Feature	Atom x5-E8000	Pentium D1508
MSRP	$18-83%	$106
Performance per Dollar	178.8+484%	30.6
Release Date	2016	2015

Search Atom x5-E8000 on Amazon

Search Pentium D1508 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.