A10-6800K vs Core i7-4600M

A10-6800K vs Core i7-4600M Performance Spectrum

A10-6800K

4 / 4

3,186

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4600M

2 / 4

3,204

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6800K vs Core i7-4600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6800K vs Core i7-4600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6800K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4600M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,186 vs 3,204).

Core i7-4600M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6800K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6800K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6800K better than Core i7-4600M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-6800K is ahead with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4600M pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4600M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6800K still makes the most sense overall. A10-6800K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4600M is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A10-6800K vs Core i7-4600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4600M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — a 20% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-4600M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 477 vs 1,025, a 73% lead for the Core i7-4600M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600M.

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i7-4600M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+22%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+41%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,186	3,204
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	656
Geekbench 6 Single	477	1,025+115%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,132

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-6800K versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the A10-6800K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-6800K) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i7-4600M
Socket	FM2	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-6800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6800K) vs true (Core i7-4600M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6800K) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget, Core i7-4600M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130.