A10-6800K vs Core i7-4600M
A10-6800K
Core i7-4600M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-6800K is positioned at rank 401 and the Core i7-4600M is on rank 71, so the Core i7-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-6800K
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4600M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-6800K | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-6800K | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-6800K and Core i7-4600M
A10-6800K
The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.
Core i7-4600M
The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.
Processing Power
The A10-6800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4600M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — a 20% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-4600M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 477 vs 1,025, a 73% lead for the Core i7-4600M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600M.
| Feature | A10-6800K | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+41% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,186 | 3,204 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 656 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 477 | 1,025+115% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,132 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-6800K versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the Core i7-4600M supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-6800K) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).
| Feature | A10-6800K | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR3L 1600 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the A10-6800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6800K) vs true (Core i7-4600M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6800K) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget, Core i7-4600M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130.
| Feature | A10-6800K | Core i7-4600M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8670D | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Budget | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-6800K and Core i7-4600M
