A10-6800K
VS
Core i7-2715QE

A10-6800K vs Core i7-2715QE

AMD

A10-6800K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-2715QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-6800K is positioned at rank 401 and the Core i7-2715QE is on rank 1118, so the A10-6800K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-6800K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5870%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4027%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1213%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
961%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
841%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
482%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
475%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
433%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
433%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
428%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
416%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
410%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
409%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
405%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
99%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
99%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
98%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
98%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
98%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
98%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
97%
#401
A10-6800K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
100%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
99%
#410
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2715QE

#1106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3444%
#1107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3393%
#1108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3115%
#1109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3101%
#1110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3073%
#1112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2967%
#1113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2845%
#1114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2840%
#1115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2764%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
100%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1129
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
96%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-2715QE delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A10-6800K in both compute-intensive tasks (1.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA10-6800KCore i7-2715QE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-6800KCore i7-2715QE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-6800K and Core i7-2715QE

AMD

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Intel

Core i7-2715QE

The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The A10-6800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2715QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE — a 37.8% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-2715QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Core i7-2715QE's 3,221 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-2715QE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 477 vs 587, a 20.7% lead for the Core i7-2715QE that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2715QE.

FeatureA10-6800KCore i7-2715QE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+47%
3 GHz
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+95%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,186
3,221+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
477
587+23%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2715QE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The A10-6800K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-6800K) and QM67,HM65 (Core i7-2715QE).

FeatureA10-6800KCore i7-2715QE
Socket
FM2
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-6800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6800K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6800K) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2715QE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget, Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130; Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureA10-6800KCore i7-2715QE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8670D
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Embedded/Industrial