A10-6800K vs Core i7-2715QE

A10-6800K vs Core i7-2715QE Performance Spectrum

A10-6800K

4 / 4

3,186

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-2715QE

4 / 8

3,221

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6800K vs Core i7-2715QE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6800K vs Core i7-2715QE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6800K

2013

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-2715QE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (477 vs 587).
❌Lower PassMark (3,186 vs 3,221).
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Core i7-2715QE

2011

Why buy it

✅+23.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while A10-6800K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6800K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2715QE better than A10-6800K?

Yes. Core i7-2715QE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2715QE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2715QE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2715QE is the better buy right now. Core i7-2715QE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $378 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6800K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6800K vs Core i7-2715QE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Core i7-2715QE

The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2715QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE — a 37.8% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-2715QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Core i7-2715QE's 3,221 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-2715QE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 477 vs 587, a 20.7% lead for the Core i7-2715QE that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2715QE.

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i7-2715QE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+47%	3 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+95%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,186	3,221+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	477	587+23%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2715QE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-6800K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2715QE — the A10-6800K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-6800K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-6800K) and QM67,HM65 (Core i7-2715QE).

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i7-2715QE
Socket	FM2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-6800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6800K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6800K) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2715QE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget, Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130; Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i7-2715QE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8670D	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Embedded/Industrial