A10-6800K
VS
Core i5-2400S

A10-6800K vs Core i5-2400S

AMD

A10-6800K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-2400S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-6800K is positioned at rank 401 and the Core i5-2400S is on rank 713, so the A10-6800K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-6800K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5870%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4027%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1213%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
961%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
841%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
482%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
475%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
433%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
433%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
428%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
416%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
410%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
409%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
405%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
99%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
99%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
98%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
98%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
98%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
98%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
97%
#401
A10-6800K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
100%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
99%
#410
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2400S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13203%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12475%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9058%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2729%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2161%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1891%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1083%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1069%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
973%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
973%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
962%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
936%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
923%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
919%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
911%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
100%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
100%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
99%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
99%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
99%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
99%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
99%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
99%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
99%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
98%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
98%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
98%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
98%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-2400S delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A10-6800K in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA10-6800KCore i5-2400S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-6800KCore i5-2400S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-6800K and Core i5-2400S

AMD

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Intel

Core i5-2400S

The Core i5-2400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,187 points. Launch price was $141.

Processing Power

Both the A10-6800K and Core i5-2400S share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2400S — a 28.6% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-2400S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Core i5-2400S's 3,187 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-2400S. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 477 vs 578, a 19.1% lead for the Core i5-2400S that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400S.

FeatureA10-6800KCore i5-2400S
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+33%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+64%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,186
3,187
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,965
Geekbench 6 Single
477
578+21%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,966
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2400S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A10-6800K) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2400S).

FeatureA10-6800KCore i5-2400S
Socket
FM2
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6800K) vs Yes (Core i5-2400S). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6800K) and Intel HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130.

FeatureA10-6800KCore i5-2400S
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8670D
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Budget