A10-6800K vs Core i3-10110Y

A10-6800K vs Core i3-10110Y Performance Spectrum

A10-6800K

4 / 4

3,186

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-10110Y

2 / 4

3,171

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6800K vs Core i3-10110Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6800K vs Core i3-10110Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6800K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Core i3-10110Y needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-10110Y.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-10110Y

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6800K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,171 vs 3,186).
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6800K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6800K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6800K better than Core i3-10110Y?

Yes. A10-6800K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6800K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6800K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6800K still makes the most sense overall. A10-6800K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. That said, if you already own a compatible UTFCBGA1377 setup, Core i3-10110Y can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6800K vs Core i3-10110Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Core i3-10110Y

The Core i3-10110Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,171 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-10110Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K versus 4 GHz on the Core i3-10110Y — a 9.5% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 1 GHz). The A10-6800K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-10110Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6800K scores 3,186 against the Core i3-10110Y's 3,171 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-6800K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6800K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110Y.

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i3-10110Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+310%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark	3,186	3,171
Geekbench 6 Single	477	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10110Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6800K	Core i3-10110Y
Socket	FM2	UTFCBGA1377
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6800K) / not specified (Core i3-10110Y). The A10-6800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core i3-10110Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130.