Core i7-2715QE
VS
Core i7-4600M

Core i7-2715QE vs Core i7-4600M

Intel

Core i7-2715QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-4600M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2715QE is positioned at rank 1118 and the Core i7-4600M is on rank 71, so the Core i7-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2715QE

#1106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3444%
#1107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3393%
#1108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3115%
#1109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3101%
#1110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3073%
#1112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2967%
#1113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2845%
#1114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2840%
#1115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2764%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
100%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1129
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
96%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4600M

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
94%
#59
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
229%
#60
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
226%
#61
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
207%
#62
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
206%
#63
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
204%
#65
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
197%
#66
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
189%
#67
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
189%
#68
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
184%
#71
Core i7-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
98%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-4600M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2715QE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2715QECore i7-4600M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2715QECore i7-4600M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2715QE and Core i7-4600M

Intel

Core i7-2715QE

The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2715QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-4600M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2715QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4600M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-2715QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2715QE scores 3,221 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2715QE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 587 vs 1,025, a 54.3% lead for the Core i7-4600M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2715QE vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600M.

FeatureCore i7-2715QECore i7-4600M
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,221
3,204
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
Geekbench 6 Single
587
1,025+75%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,132
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2715QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4600M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2715QE versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the Core i7-4600M supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-4600M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM67,HM65 (Core i7-2715QE) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).

FeatureCore i7-2715QECore i7-4600M
Socket
BGA1023
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE) vs true (Core i7-4600M). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2715QE) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial, Core i7-4600M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureCore i7-2715QECore i7-4600M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Embedded/Industrial
Mobile