
Core i7-2715QE

Pentium Gold 4417U
Core i7-2715QE vs Pentium Gold 4417U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2715QE vs Pentium Gold 4417U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2715QE vs Pentium Gold 4417U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2715QE
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Pentium Gold 4417U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,221 vs 3,240).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
Pentium Gold 4417U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $217 less on MSRP ($161 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2715QE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2715QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium Gold 4417U better than Core i7-2715QE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2715QE vs Pentium Gold 4417U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2715QE
The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

Pentium Gold 4417U
The Pentium Gold 4417U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,240 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2715QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Gold 4417U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2715QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium Gold 4417U — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-2715QE (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-2715QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2715QE scores 3,221 against the Pentium Gold 4417U's 3,240 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium Gold 4417U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2715QE vs 2 MB on the Pentium Gold 4417U.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+200% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,221 | 3,240 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 587 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2715QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE) / not specified (Pentium Gold 4417U). The Core i7-2715QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium Gold 4417U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Embedded/Industrial | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2715QE was priced at $378, while the Pentium Gold 4417U came in at $161. On launch pricing ($378 vs $161), Pentium Gold 4417U was $217 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2715QE delivers 8.5 pts/$ vs 20.1 pts/$ for the Pentium Gold 4417U — making the Pentium Gold 4417U the 81% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $161-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 20.1+136% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














