Core i7-2715QE vs PRO A8-8650B

Core i7-2715QE vs PRO A8-8650B Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2715QE

4 / 8

3,221

0.0%

3,230

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2715QE vs PRO A8-8650B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2715QE vs PRO A8-8650B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2715QE

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while PRO A8-8650B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,221 vs 3,230).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while PRO A8-8650B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A8-8650B

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2715QE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2715QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2715QE better than PRO A8-8650B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2715QE is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, PRO A8-8650B pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A8-8650B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2715QE is the better buy right now. Core i7-2715QE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $378 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that PRO A8-8650B is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A8-8650B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2715QE vs PRO A8-8650B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2715QE

The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

PRO A8-8650B

The PRO A8-8650B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,230 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2715QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A8-8650B's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE versus 3.9 GHz on the PRO A8-8650B — a 26.1% clock advantage for the PRO A8-8650B (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-2715QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A8-8650B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2715QE scores 3,221 against the PRO A8-8650B's 3,230 — a 0.3% lead for the PRO A8-8650B.

Feature	Core i7-2715QE	PRO A8-8650B
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.9 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,221	3,230
Geekbench 6 Single	587	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2715QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A8-8650B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2715QE	PRO A8-8650B
Socket	BGA1023	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE) / not specified (PRO A8-8650B). The Core i7-2715QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A8-8650B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.