
Core i7-2715QE

FX-7500
Core i7-2715QE vs FX-7500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2715QE vs FX-7500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2715QE vs FX-7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2715QE
2011Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 32.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β136.8% higher power demand at 45W vs 19W.
FX-7500
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $278 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- β Delivers 276.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- β Draws 19W instead of 45W, a 26W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2715QE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,209 vs 3,221).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2715QE better than FX-7500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2715QE vs FX-7500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2715QE
The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

FX-7500
The FX-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,209 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2715QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-7500's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE versus 3.3 GHz on the FX-7500 β a 9.5% clock advantage for the FX-7500 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-2715QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-7500 uses Kaveri (2014β2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2715QE scores 3,221 against the FX-7500's 3,209 β a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-2715QE.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | FX-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Kaveri (2014β2015) |
| PassMark | 3,221 | 3,209 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 587 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2715QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-7500 uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2715QE) vs 8 (FX-7500) β the Core i7-2715QE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | FX-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | FP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE) vs AMD-V (FX-7500). Both include integrated graphics β HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2715QE) and Radeon R7 (FX-7500) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial, FX-7500 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | FX-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | Radeon R7 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Embedded/Industrial | Mobile |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2715QE was priced at $378, while the FX-7500 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($378 vs $100), FX-7500 was $278 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2715QE delivers 8.5 pts/$ vs 32.1 pts/$ for the FX-7500 β making the FX-7500 the 116.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | FX-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $100-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 32.1+278% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















