A8-7600 vs Core i7-4600M

A8-7600 vs Core i7-4600M Performance Spectrum

A8-7600

4 / 4

3,214

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4600M

2 / 4

3,204

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7600 vs Core i7-4600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7600 vs Core i7-4600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7600

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i7-4600M.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-4600M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,204 vs 3,214).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7600.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7600 better than Core i7-4600M?

Yes. A8-7600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7600 still makes the most sense overall. A8-7600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7600 vs Core i7-4600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7600

The A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,214 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4600M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — a 5.4% clock advantage for the A8-7600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A8-7600 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7600 scores 3,214 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 0.3% lead for the A8-7600.

Feature	A8-7600	Core i7-4600M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+6%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+7%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,214	3,204
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	656
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,025
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,132

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7600 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8-7600 versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the A8-7600 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7600 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A8-7600) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).

Feature	A8-7600	Core i7-4600M
Socket	FM2+	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+33%	DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7600) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4600M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4600M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-7600 rivals Core i3-4150.