A8-7600 vs Xeon X5560

A8-7600 vs Xeon X5560 Performance Spectrum

A8-7600

4 / 4

3,214

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X5560

4 / 8

3,231

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7600 vs Xeon X5560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7600 vs Xeon X5560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7600

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Xeon X5560 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Xeon X5560.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,214 vs 3,231).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5560, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X5560

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5560 better than A8-7600?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5560 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A8-7600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5560 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X5560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-7600 vs Xeon X5560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7600

The A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,214 points. Launch price was $90.

Xeon X5560

The Xeon X5560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,231 points. Launch price was $44.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5560's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7600 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5560 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the A8-7600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A8-7600 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X5560 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7600 scores 3,214 against the Xeon X5560's 3,231 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5560.

Feature	A8-7600	Xeon X5560
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+11%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,214	3,231

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7600 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5560 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8-7600 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5560 — the A8-7600 supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A8-7600) vs 3 (Xeon X5560). Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A8-7600) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5560).

Feature	A8-7600	Xeon X5560
Socket	FM2+	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-7600) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5560). The A8-7600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Xeon X5560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5560 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: A8-7600 rivals Core i3-4150; Xeon X5560 rivals Core i3-2100.