A8-7600 vs Core i5-4570T

AMD

A8-7600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4570T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

A8-7600 vs Core i5-4570T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7600 vs Core i5-4570T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7600 vs Core i5-4570T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7600

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (3,214 vs 3,223).
    • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

    Core i5-4570T

    2013

    Why buy it

    • +0.3% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $195 MSRP, while A8-7600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-4570T better than A8-7600?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7600 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4570T pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4570T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-4570T is the better buy right now. Core i5-4570T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $195 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that A8-7600 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    A8-7600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A8-7600 vs Core i5-4570T Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A8-7600

    The A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,214 points. Launch price was $90.

    Intel

    Core i5-4570T

    The Core i5-4570T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,223 points. Launch price was $222.

    Processing Power

    The A8-7600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4570T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A8-7600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-4570T — a 5.4% clock advantage for the A8-7600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A8-7600 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4570T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7600 scores 3,214 against the Core i5-4570T's 3,223 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4570T.

    FeatureA8-7600Core i5-4570T
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.8 GHz+6%
    3.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.1 GHz+7%
    2.9 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4096 kB (total)
    L2 Cache
    4096 kB+1500%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    28 nm
    22 nm-21%
    Architecture
    Kaveri (2014−2015)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    3,214
    3,223
    Geekbench 6 Single
    960
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,719
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A8-7600 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4570T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A8-7600 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4570T — the A8-7600 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7600 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A8-7600) and Intel 8 Series,Intel 9 Series (Core i5-4570T).

    FeatureA8-7600Core i5-4570T
    Socket
    FM2+
    LGA1150
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    2133+33%
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB+100%
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-7600) vs Yes (Core i5-4570T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7600) and HD 4600 (Core i5-4570T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4570T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-7600 rivals Core i3-4150.

    FeatureA8-7600Core i5-4570T
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon R7 Graphics
    HD 4600
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    true
    Yes
    Target Use
    Desktop