Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon W-2104

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon W-2104 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon W-2104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4700HQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 47W instead of 120W, a 73W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-2104

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,530 vs 5,579).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i7-4700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌155.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4700HQ better than Xeon W-2104?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2104 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4700HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4700HQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4700HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4700HQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2104 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4700HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-2104 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4700HQ vs Xeon W-2104 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4700HQ

The Core i7-4700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,579 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon W-2104

The Xeon W-2104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,530 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4700HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon W-2104's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2104 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4700HQ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4700HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-2104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700HQ scores 5,579 against the Xeon W-2104's 5,530 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-4700HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700HQ vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2104.

Feature	Core i7-4700HQ	Xeon W-2104
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8.25 MB (total)+3%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,579	5,530

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4700HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2104 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.