Core i7-4702HQ vs Xeon X5687

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4702HQ vs Xeon X5687 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4702HQ vs Xeon X5687: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4702HQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 37W instead of 130W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5687 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5687, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.

Xeon X5687

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,386 vs 5,406).
❌Launch MSRP is still $552 MSRP, while Core i7-4702HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌251.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 37W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4702HQ better than Xeon X5687?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5687 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4702HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4702HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4702HQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5687 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4702HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $552 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5687 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon X5687 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4702HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4702HQ vs Xeon X5687 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4702HQ

The Core i7-4702HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,406 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon X5687

The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4702HQ and Xeon X5687 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702HQ versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5687 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4702HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5687 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4702HQ scores 5,406 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-4702HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702HQ vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5687.

Feature	Core i7-4702HQ	Xeon X5687
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.86 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+64%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,406	5,386
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,643
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,386

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4702HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5687 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4702HQ	Xeon X5687
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	288 GB
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	36