Core i7-4712MQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838

Core i7-4712MQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4712MQ

4 / 8

5,315

0.0%

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

+0.5%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4712MQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4712MQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4712MQ

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 838 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,315 vs 5,343).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is MediaTek Kompanio 838 better than Core i7-4712MQ?

Yes. MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 is still the much better call for a fresh build. MediaTek Kompanio 838 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-4712MQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4712MQ vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4712MQ

The Core i7-4712MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,315 points. Launch price was $378.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4712MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4712MQ versus 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-4712MQ (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-4712MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024). In PassMark, the Core i7-4712MQ scores 5,315 against the MediaTek Kompanio 838's 5,343 — a 0.5% lead for the MediaTek Kompanio 838.

Feature	Core i7-4712MQ	MediaTek Kompanio 838
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	—
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	5,315	5,343