Core i7-4712MQ vs Opteron 6328

Core i7-4712MQ vs Opteron 6328 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4712MQ

4 / 8

5,315

+0.2%

5,306

0.0%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4712MQ vs Opteron 6328 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4712MQ vs Opteron 6328: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4712MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $197 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
✅Draws 37W instead of 115W, a 78W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6328, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Opteron 6328

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,306 vs 5,315).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($575 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
❌210.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 37W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4712MQ better than Opteron 6328?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6328 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4712MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4712MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4712MQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-4712MQ comes in $197 cheaper on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $575 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6328 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 52.4% better value on MSRP (14.1 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4712MQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4712MQ vs Opteron 6328 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4712MQ

The Core i7-4712MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,315 points. Launch price was $378.

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4712MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6328 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4712MQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4712MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6328 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4712MQ scores 5,315 against the Opteron 6328's 5,306 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4712MQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4712MQ	Opteron 6328
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.8 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	5,315	5,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4712MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6328 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4712MQ	Opteron 6328
Socket	PGA946	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4712MQ was priced at $378, while the Opteron 6328 came in at $575. On launch pricing ($378 vs $575), Core i7-4712MQ was $197 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4712MQ delivers 14.1 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Opteron 6328 — making the Core i7-4712MQ the 41.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4712MQ	Opteron 6328
MSRP	$378-34%	$575
Performance per Dollar	14.1+53%	9.2
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Core i7-4712MQ on Amazon

Search Opteron 6328 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.