Core i7-4720HQ vs Xeon E5-1410 v2

Intel

Core i7-4720HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd1 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1410 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Core i7-4720HQ vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4720HQ vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4720HQ vs Xeon E5-1410 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4720HQ

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 1W instead of 80W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1410 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (5,714 vs 5,715).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1410 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌7900% higher power demand at 80W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1410 v2 better than Core i7-4720HQ?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1410 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4720HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-1410 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-1410 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4720HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4720HQ vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4720HQ

The Core i7-4720HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,714 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Xeon E5-1410 v2

The Xeon E5-1410 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013βˆ’2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 5,715 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4720HQ and Xeon E5-1410 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4720HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 v2 β€” a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4720HQ (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-4720HQ uses the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013βˆ’2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4720HQ scores 5,714 against the Xeon E5-1410 v2's 5,715 β€” a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-1410 v2. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i7-4720HQ vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 v2.

FeatureCore i7-4720HQXeon E5-1410 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+12%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
6 MB
10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
1 MB
256K (per core)+25500%
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
Ivy Bridge-EN (2013βˆ’2014)
PassMark
5,714
5,715
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4720HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4720HQXeon E5-1410 v2
Socket
BGA1364
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0