Core i7-4770T vs FX-8350

Core i7-4770T vs FX-8350 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4770T

4 / 8

5,854

0.0%

5,936

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4770T vs FX-8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4770T vs FX-8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4770T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,854 vs 5,936).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.4 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

FX-8350

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 23.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8350 better than Core i7-4770T?

Yes. FX-8350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8350 is the better buy right now. FX-8350 comes in $51 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 27.4% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 23.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4770T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4770T vs FX-8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4770T

The Core i7-4770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,854 points. Launch price was $610.

FX-8350

The FX-8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,936 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4770T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8350 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4770T versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-8350 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the FX-8350 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-4770T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770T scores 5,854 against the FX-8350's 5,936 — a 1.4% lead for the FX-8350.

Feature	Core i7-4770T	FX-8350
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8192 kB+3100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	5,854	5,936+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4770T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4770T	FX-8350
Socket	LGA1150	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4770T was priced at $250, while the FX-8350 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($250 vs $199), FX-8350 was $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770T delivers 23.4 pts/$ vs 29.8 pts/$ for the FX-8350 — making the FX-8350 the 24.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4770T	FX-8350
MSRP	$250	$199-20%
Performance per Dollar	23.4	29.8+27%
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Core i7-4770T on Amazon

Search FX-8350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.