Core i7-4770TE vs Xeon X5672

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4770TE vs Xeon X5672 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4770TE vs Xeon X5672: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4770TE

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,023 vs 5,036).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌
1% HIGHER MSRP
$303 MSRPvs$300 MSRP

Xeon X5672

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $3 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5672 better than Core i7-4770TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5672 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4770TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5672 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5672 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5672 is the better buy right now. Xeon X5672 comes in $3 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.3% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4770TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4770TE vs Xeon X5672 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4770TE

The Core i7-4770TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,023 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5672

The Xeon X5672 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,036 points. Launch price was $115.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4770TE and Xeon X5672 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4770TE versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5672 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5672 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4770TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5672 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770TE scores 5,023 against the Xeon X5672's 5,036 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X5672. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4770TE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5672.

Feature	Core i7-4770TE	Xeon X5672
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	8192 kB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,023	5,036

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4770TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5672 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4770TE	Xeon X5672
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4770TE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5672). Primary use case: Xeon X5672 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5672 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Core i7-4770TE	Xeon X5672
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4770TE was priced at $303, while the Xeon X5672 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($303 vs $300), Xeon X5672 was $3 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770TE delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon X5672 — making the Xeon X5672 the 1.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4770TE	Xeon X5672
MSRP	$303	$300
Performance per Dollar	16.6	16.8+1%
Release Date	2013	2011

Search Core i7-4770TE on Amazon

Search Xeon X5672 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.