Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-4770TE

Intel

Core i5-7300HQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-4770TE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-4770TE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-4770TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-4770TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7300HQ

2017

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Core i7-4770TE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-4770TE

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,023 vs 5,077).
  • Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Core i5-7300HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7300HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7300HQ better than Core i7-4770TE?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4770TE is ahead with a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7300HQ pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Core i7-4770TE also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7300HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-7300HQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-7300HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. Core i7-4770TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7300HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-4770TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-7300HQ

The Core i5-7300HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,077 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core i7-4770TE

The Core i7-4770TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,023 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-7300HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4770TE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7300HQ versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4770TE — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-7300HQ (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-7300HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4770TE uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7300HQ scores 5,077 against the Core i7-4770TE's 5,023 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-7300HQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7300HQ vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4770TE.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQCore i7-4770TE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+6%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+9%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,077+1%
5,023
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7300HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4770TE uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQCore i7-4770TE
Socket
BGA1440
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7300HQ) / not specified (Core i7-4770TE). The Core i5-7300HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-4770TE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7300HQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQCore i7-4770TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile