Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon Platinum 8260L
Core i5-7300HQ
Xeon Platinum 8260L
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-7300HQ is positioned at rank 698 and the Xeon Platinum 8260L is on rank 1030, so the Core i5-7300HQ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7300HQ
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260L
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-7300HQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($750) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-H (2017) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-7300HQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($750) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-7300HQ and Xeon Platinum 8260L
Core i5-7300HQ
The Core i5-7300HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,077 points. Launch price was $250.
Xeon Platinum 8260L
The Xeon Platinum 8260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,103 points. Launch price was $12,599.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7300HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260L offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260L has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7300HQ versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260L — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260L (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-7300HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7300HQ scores 5,077 against the Xeon Platinum 8260L's 5,103 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260L. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7300HQ vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8260L.
| Feature | Core i5-7300HQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 24 / 48+500% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+496% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 24 MB+9500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-H (2017) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 5,077 | 5,103 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7300HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7300HQ versus 2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260L — the Xeon Platinum 8260L supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260L supports up to 4608 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 194.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-7300HQ) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260L). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-7300HQ) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260L) — the Xeon Platinum 8260L offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-7300HQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | 2933+73225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+1456256% | 4608 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7300HQ) vs true (Xeon Platinum 8260L). The Core i5-7300HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7300HQ targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-7300HQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-7300HQ and Xeon Platinum 8260L
