Core i5-7300HQ
VS
Core i7-3615QM

Core i5-7300HQ vs Core i7-3615QM

Intel

Core i5-7300HQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-3615QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-7300HQ is positioned at rank 698 and the Core i7-3615QM is on rank 307, so the Core i7-3615QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7300HQ

#686
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
983%
#687
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
968%
#688
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
889%
#689
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
885%
#690
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
877%
#692
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
847%
#693
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
812%
#694
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
810%
#695
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
789%
#698
Core i5-7300HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
100%
#705
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
#712
Core i7-10850H
MSRP: $395|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3615QM

#295
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
454%
#296
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
448%
#297
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
411%
#298
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
409%
#299
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
405%
#301
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
391%
#302
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
375%
#303
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
375%
#304
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
365%
#307
Core i7-3615QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7300HQ (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-7300HQCore i7-3615QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-H (2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3615QM (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-7300HQCore i7-3615QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-7300HQ and Core i7-3615QM

Intel

Core i5-7300HQ

The Core i5-7300HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,077 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core i7-3615QM

The Core i7-3615QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,167 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Core i5-7300HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3615QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7300HQ versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3615QM — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-7300HQ (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-7300HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3615QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7300HQ scores 5,077 against the Core i7-3615QM's 5,167 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i7-3615QM. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQCore i7-3615QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+6%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+9%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
5,077
5,167+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7300HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3615QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQCore i7-3615QM
Socket
BGA1440
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7300HQ) / not specified (Core i7-3615QM). The Core i5-7300HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-3615QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7300HQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQCore i7-3615QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile