Core i7-4785T
VS
Core i7-4860EQ

Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-4860EQ

Intel

Core i7-4785T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4785T is positioned at rank 843 and the Core i7-4860EQ is on rank 1021, so the Core i7-4785T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4785T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17385%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16427%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11927%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3593%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2846%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2490%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1426%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1407%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1282%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1281%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1267%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1233%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1216%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1211%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1200%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
100%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
100%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
99%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
99%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
99%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
99%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
98%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4860EQ

#1009
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2312%
#1010
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2278%
#1011
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2091%
#1012
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2082%
#1013
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2063%
#1015
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1992%
#1016
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1910%
#1017
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1907%
#1018
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1856%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
100%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
99%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
96%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core i7-4860EQ shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCore i7-4785TCore i7-4860EQ
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($32)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i7-4785T holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $32 (vs $80), it costs 60% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 149% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i7-4860EQ.
InsightCore i7-4785TCore i7-4860EQ
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+149%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($32)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4785T and Core i7-4860EQ

Intel

Core i7-4785T

The Core i7-4785T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,486 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

The Core i7-4860EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,508 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4785T and Core i7-4860EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4785T versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4860EQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-4785T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4860EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4785T scores 5,486 against the Core i7-4860EQ's 5,508 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-4860EQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-4785TCore i7-4860EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+22%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,486
5,508
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4785T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4860EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4785TCore i7-4860EQ
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4785T launched at $306 MSRP, while the Core i7-4860EQ debuted at $434. At current prices ($32 vs $80), the Core i7-4785T is $48 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4785T delivers 171.4 pts/$ vs 68.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-4860EQ — making the Core i7-4785T the 85.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4785TCore i7-4860EQ
MSRP
$306-29%
$434
Avg Price (30d)
$32-60%
$80
Performance per Dollar
171.4+149%
68.8
Release Date
2013
2014