Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-6822EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-6822EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-6822EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4785T

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,486 vs 5,550).
❌
4.1% HIGHER MSRP
$306 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6822EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 530, while Core i7-4785T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4785T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6822EQ better than Core i7-4785T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4785T is ahead with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6822EQ pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6822EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6822EQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-6822EQ comes in $12 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $306 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4785T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.3% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 17.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6822EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4785T vs Core i7-6822EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4785T

The Core i7-4785T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,486 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4785T and Core i7-6822EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4785T versus 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4785T. The Core i7-4785T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6822EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4785T scores 5,486 against the Core i7-6822EQ's 5,550 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-6822EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4785T vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ.

Feature	Core i7-4785T	Core i7-6822EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	5,486	5,550+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	684
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,796

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4785T) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ). The Core i7-6822EQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-4785T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-4785T	Core i7-6822EQ
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	—	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4785T was priced at $306, while the Core i7-6822EQ came in at $294. On launch pricing ($306 vs $294), Core i7-6822EQ was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4785T delivers 17.9 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-6822EQ — making the Core i7-6822EQ the 5.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4785T	Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP	$306	$294-4%
Performance per Dollar	17.9	18.9+6%
Release Date	2013	2015

Search Core i7-4785T on Amazon

Search Core i7-6822EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.