
Core i7-4790S

Xeon E5-1620 v3
Core i7-4790S vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4790S vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4790S vs Xeon E5-1620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4790S
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1620 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌6.1% HIGHER MSRP$312 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
Xeon E5-1620 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅Costs $18 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4790S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,959 vs 6,973).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4790S better than Xeon E5-1620 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4790S vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4790S
The Core i7-4790S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,973 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E5-1620 v3
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-4790S and Xeon E5-1620 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4790S versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4790S (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-4790S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4790S scores 6,973 against the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 6,959 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4790S. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4790S vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,973 | 6,959 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4790S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4790S) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4790S was priced at $312, while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($312 vs $294), Xeon E5-1620 v3 was $18 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4790S delivers 22.3 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — making the Xeon E5-1620 v3 the 5.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $312 | $294-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3 | 23.7+6% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















