Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-4910MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-4910MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-4910MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4860HQ

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4910MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,204 vs 6,297).

Core i7-4910MQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $570 MSRP, while Core i7-4860HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4910MQ better than Core i7-4860HQ?

Yes. Core i7-4910MQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4910MQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4910MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4910MQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-4910MQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $570 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4910MQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i7-4910MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4860HQ

The Core i7-4860HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,204 points. Launch price was $434.

Core i7-4910MQ

The Core i7-4910MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,297 points. Launch price was $568.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4860HQ and Core i7-4910MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4860HQ versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4910MQ — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4910MQ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-4860HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4910MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4860HQ scores 6,204 against the Core i7-4910MQ's 6,297 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-4910MQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4860HQ	Core i7-4910MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	6,204	6,297+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4860HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4910MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.