Core i7-4860HQ vs Xeon D-1622

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4860HQ vs Xeon D-1622 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4860HQ vs Xeon D-1622: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4860HQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,204 vs 6,205).
❌17.5% higher power demand at 47W vs 40W.

Xeon D-1622

2019

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 40W instead of 47W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4860HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $195 MSRP, while Core i7-4860HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1622 better than Core i7-4860HQ?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1622 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4860HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1622 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1622 is the better buy right now. Xeon D-1622 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $195 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4860HQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (31.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1622 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4860HQ vs Xeon D-1622 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4860HQ

The Core i7-4860HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,204 points. Launch price was $434.

Xeon D-1622

The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4860HQ and Xeon D-1622 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4860HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4860HQ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-4860HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon D-1622 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4860HQ scores 6,204 against the Xeon D-1622's 6,205 — a 0% lead for the Xeon D-1622. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4860HQ vs 6 MB on the Xeon D-1622.

Feature	Core i7-4860HQ	Xeon D-1622
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	6,204	6,205

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4860HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1622 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.