
Core i7-4900MQ

Core i7-6700TE
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-6700TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-6700TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-6700TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4900MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,146 vs 6,203).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($570 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-6700TE
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $267 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4900MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6700TE better than Core i7-4900MQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4900MQ vs Core i7-6700TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4900MQ
The Core i7-4900MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,146 points. Launch price was $568.

Core i7-6700TE
The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-4900MQ and Core i7-6700TE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4900MQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4900MQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-4900MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6700TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4900MQ scores 6,146 against the Core i7-6700TE's 6,203 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-6700TE. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Core i7-6700TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 6,146 | 6,203 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 914 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,244 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4900MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6700TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Core i7-6700TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4900MQ) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-6700TE). The Core i7-6700TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-4900MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Core i7-6700TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 530 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4900MQ was priced at $570, while the Core i7-6700TE came in at $303. On launch pricing ($570 vs $303), Core i7-6700TE was $267 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4900MQ delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-6700TE — making the Core i7-6700TE the 62% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Core i7-6700TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $570 | $303-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 20.5+90% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














