Core i7-4900MQ vs Xeon X5670

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4900MQ vs Xeon X5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4900MQ vs Xeon X5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4900MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 47W instead of 95W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,146 vs 6,160).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5670, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($570 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Xeon X5670

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Costs $503 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
✅Delivers 752.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($67 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4900MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌102.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4900MQ better than Xeon X5670?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4900MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4900MQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5670 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4900MQ comes in 750.7% more expensive on MSRP at $570 MSRP versus $67 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon X5670 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon X5670 is also 752.7% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4900MQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4900MQ vs Xeon X5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4900MQ

The Core i7-4900MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,146 points. Launch price was $568.

Xeon X5670

The Xeon X5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,160 points. Launch price was $67.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4900MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4900MQ versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5670 — a 13.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4900MQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i7-4900MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5670 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4900MQ scores 6,146 against the Xeon X5670's 6,160 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5670. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4900MQ vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5670.

Feature	Core i7-4900MQ	Xeon X5670
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+14%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.93 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,146	6,160

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4900MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4900MQ	Xeon X5670
Socket	PGA946	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4900MQ) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5670). Primary use case: Xeon X5670 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5670 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Core i7-4900MQ	Xeon X5670
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4900MQ was priced at $570, while the Xeon X5670 came in at $67. On launch pricing ($570 vs $67), Xeon X5670 was $503 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4900MQ delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 91.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X5670 — making the Xeon X5670 the 158% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4900MQ	Xeon X5670
MSRP	$570	$67-88%
Performance per Dollar	10.8	91.9+751%
Release Date	2013	2010

Search Core i7-4900MQ on Amazon

Search Xeon X5670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.