
Core i7-4900MQ

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4900MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 120W, a 73W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,146 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($570 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +144.2% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 608.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌155.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 47W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Core i7-4900MQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4900MQ
The Core i7-4900MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,146 points. Launch price was $568.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4900MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4900MQ versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i7-4900MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4900MQ scores 6,146 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 139.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4900MQ vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 5 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 5 nm-77% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 6,146 | 34,293+458% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4900MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4900MQ) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i7-4900MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4900MQ was priced at $570, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($570 vs $449), Ryzen 7 7800X3D was $121 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4900MQ delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 150.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $570 | $449-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 76.4+607% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














