Core i7-4930K vs Xeon E5-4627 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4930K vs Xeon E5-4627 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4930K vs Xeon E5-4627 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4930K

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,391 less on MSRP ($670 MSRP vs $2,061 MSRP).
✅Delivers 206.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $2,061 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 9,425).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4627 v2, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E5-4627 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($2,061 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4627 v2 better than Core i7-4930K?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4627 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4930K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4627 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4627 v2 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-4627 v2 comes in 207.6% more expensive on MSRP at $2,061 MSRP versus $670 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Core i7-4930K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 206.1% better value on paper (14.0 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2011.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4627 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4930K vs Xeon E5-4627 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4930K

The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.

Xeon E5-4627 v2

The Xeon E5-4627 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,425 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4627 v2 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-4627 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v2 — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4930K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4930K is built on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-4930K scores 9,379 against the Xeon E5-4627 v2's 9,425 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4627 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K vs 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4627 v2.

Feature	Core i7-4930K	Xeon E5-4627 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+8%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+3%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)	—
PassMark	9,379	9,425

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i7-4930K	Xeon E5-4627 v2
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4930K was priced at $670, while the Xeon E5-4627 v2 came in at $2061. On launch pricing ($670 vs $2061), Core i7-4930K was $1391 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4930K delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4627 v2 — making the Core i7-4930K the 101.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4930K	Xeon E5-4627 v2
MSRP	$670-67%	$2061
Performance per Dollar	14.0+204%	4.6
Release Date	2013	2014

Search Core i7-4930K on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4627 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.