Core i7-4950HQ
VS
Xeon E5-2608L v4

Core i7-4950HQ vs Xeon E5-2608L v4

Intel

Core i7-4950HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

8 Cores16 Thrd50 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4950HQ is positioned at rank 236 and the Xeon E5-2608L v4 is on rank 529, so the Core i7-4950HQ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4950HQ

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#224
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
396%
#225
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
390%
#226
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
358%
#227
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
357%
#228
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
354%
#230
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
341%
#231
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
327%
#232
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
327%
#233
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
318%
#236
Core i7-4950HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2608L v4

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8370%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7909%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5743%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1730%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1370%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1199%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
687%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
678%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
617%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
617%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
610%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
594%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
585%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
583%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
578%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
100%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
96%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
100%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
98%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
97%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
96%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
94%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
94%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($174) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-4950HQXeon E5-2608L v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($174)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4950HQ ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($174 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-4950HQXeon E5-2608L v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($174)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4950HQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4

Intel

Core i7-4950HQ

The Core i7-4950HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,405 points. Launch price was $657.

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4950HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4950HQ versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 76.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4950HQ. The Core i7-4950HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4950HQ scores 7,405 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2608L v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4950HQ vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.

FeatureCore i7-4950HQXeon E5-2608L v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+125%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
20 MB+150%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
7,405
7,447
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,317
Geekbench 6 Single
842
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,317
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-4950HQ) / not specified (Xeon E5-2608L v4). The Core i7-4950HQ includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 5200), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i7-4950HQXeon E5-2608L v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes